CO129-240 - Public Offices & Others - 1888 — Page 423

they have no claim to remain in the service in the event of a

Judge being apponited? & I think the only safe thing is to the Shails

معه

act as in

t case

But

Fifer the I. of State to have nothing to do with the appts, making it clear that the appt. in in gift of the Indze & therefore purely temporary perhaps the for. of Hongking should first be consulted. E It is assumed by Paper of

Parties in 21145/82

sutitted to free Judzei Clarks Presages, two Iouppose thing again it must be allowed? ? Appon Ind I would add that

if

aR

that the

case

the appointment is a permanent

ther Sec. of State might

carefully to examine qualifen

not merel of the Candidate, and in fact to select f

Phillippon app accept the Approve to. Phillischon sch

a

Z exact

but Judzes

normination?

+ allow him free passage, Consult fivemor futuon position of such appts

the position in the Strait,

explaining

it is not

& promiting out that if it pensimable appt. it should be removed from the Fixed Estabt

the Estimates; Colinden Ipe opportunity of saging their last also to Jo. of Straits with reference to

and

"

1061/671

Ieee that they appear

water Fixed Cotat? Colin

414

this (as in prev) gear & Salimatis Su96 Jurse 88

Either Judges

claks are

permanent

are not.

judge has no

as a matter

Government officials or they

If they are the Right of patronage, though

be given it if they of courtesy he may be given

not. "They

should not be approved!

are not.

by this office & should not be passage.

that it is

:

given

I think it is clear

a case

of a private Sear-

१

-tary & not a permanent gooût servant, I that the judges clack has no right

to passage regular promotion

Mr. Meade

as well as no claim to

You shmen Lee This -

C.P.L. 7. Jane

way thist the matter is to